Outcomes Workshop Update

Hi All,

In addition to adding the draft report to the blog soon we will post the posters showing how the groups tried to classify activity and observations from our quick poll of what was worthwhile capturing and what was easy/difficult to capture.

*Update* Here’s how both groups attempted to categorise research activity :

London_summary   Glasgow_summary

London Communication and Impact discussion

London Communication and Impact discussion

Glasgow further funding discussion

Glasgow further funding discussion

Here is what we did at the workshops:

Key issues arising included:

  • Discussion about the purpose of data collection for RCUK  – is it really for justification of spend to treasury and the public or will future funding be affected?
  • Overlap of categories
  • Definitions need to be clearer to ease the pain of allocation to categories
  • Difficult of capturing information about some of the entities
  • Quality difficult to assess – could be based on story telling ability

 

Glasgow publications and performances

Glasgow publications and performances

London Identifying Issues

London Identifying Issues

Here is the short presentation on output management at the University of Glasgow:

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: